Introduction: Power in the Shadows of Disorder
Protocol No. 18 of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion outlines a chilling strategy: to weaponize public disorder and social instability as a means of strengthening elite control. The protocol discusses deliberately undermining public order, sabotaging trust in law enforcement, and using sudden "terroristic attacks" to justify repression and surveillance.

Though long denounced as a forgery and antisemitic propaganda, when this protocol is compared to real-world operations revealed in the writings of Dr. John Coleman and central banking historian Stephen Mitford Goodson, the tactics it describes emerge as hauntingly real mechanisms of governance—not uniquely Jewish, but universally authoritarian.

The Protocol’s Core Message: Orchestrated Chaos as Control
Protocol 18 states that “the ruler will employ the most violent measures to prevent and suppress disorder”, but reveals that these disorders are not entirely organic. The elite allegedly fund and manipulate both sides—inciting protests, uprisings, and criminality, only to crack down with increased surveillance and legal control.

The aim? To create a “justification for totalitarian measures”, where fear-stricken populations beg for protection and give up freedoms in the process.

This strategic use of chaos as a pretext for consolidation of power mirrors the doctrine of “Problem-Reaction-Solution,” often observed in the tactics of institutions like Tavistock, the Club of Rome, and the Committee of 300.

John Coleman’s Confirmation: Tavistock’s Social Engineering
In The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Dr. Coleman reveals how British and American think tanks—including Tavistock and Stanford Research—engineered protests, counterculture movements, and urban unrest in the 20th century. According to Coleman, these events were not organic uprisings but “psychological operations” that led to increased centralization of state power.

Protocols 18's focus on engineered disorder is confirmed by Tavistock's model: create fear, undermine trust in existing systems, and offer the elite as the sole path to order. Tavistock’s manipulation of “inner directional conditioning” and trauma-based control perfectly aligns with the methods described in this protocol.

From Street Riots to Financial Riots: A Broader Reading of Disorder
Dr. Coleman, in Diplomacy by Deception and The Committee of 300, expands the scope of engineered chaos to include economic and institutional breakdowns. He outlines how staged economic crashes, planned inflation, and fabricated “terrorist threats” are tools of elite dominance.

Coleman also identifies the deliberate sabotage of public services—especially law enforcement and judicial integrity—as a core tactic. Protocol 18 specifically refers to disarming the police and undermining their authority, a tactic echoed in modern movements where calls to defund or delegitimize police are weaponized by elite entities to increase federal oversight and militarization.

Modern Parallels: From Urban Unrest to the Global War on Terror
After 9/11, the world witnessed an expansion of global surveillance, secret courts, and indefinite detention laws. While the attacks were real, their political aftermath—such as the Patriot Act—was long prepared. Protocol 18's warning that “terrorism will be used to shock the people into obedience” became a lived reality in the early 21st century.

Similarly, movements of social unrest, like the Arab Spring, were initially seen as grassroots revolutions. However, Dr. Coleman points to the role of intelligence agencies and supranational think tanks in steering these events toward chaos, only to later offer “stabilizing” governments aligned with elite goals.

The Rothschild Angle: Financing Both Sides of Disorder
In The Rothschild Dynasty, Coleman exposes how revolutions and uprisings—such as those in France and Russia—were often funded by the same banking houses that later financed the “order” which emerged afterward. This “Hegelian dialectic” approach—thesis, antithesis, synthesis—is at the heart of Protocol 18.

Disorder is not the enemy of the elite—it is their tool.

Conclusion: The Truth Behind Protocol 18 Isn’t the Text, but the Tactic
Whether The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are viewed as a forgery or a transmission of covert plans, the disturbing accuracy of Protocol 18’s strategy is undeniable when compared with real historical and modern tactics of power consolidation.

The real question is not whether Jews or Freemasons orchestrated these strategies—but whether any elite class, across history and ideology, has consistently relied on managed disorder to secure dominance.

As Coleman’s works reveal, the faces may change, but the method remains the same.